Property & Casualty
Three Key Pitfalls of Casualty Claims Management
Three Key Pitfalls of Casualty Claims Management
Risk professionals have navigated the complexities of casualty claims management, holding firsthand experience of the challenges and frustrations the process can bring. A small mistake or oversight could increase costs and inefficiencies if not adequately addressed. The three most common pitfalls and their potential solutions are outlined below.
-
Delayed or Ineffective Claims Resolution
Delays in processing and resolving claims can create a ripple effect of inefficiencies. Whether due to outdated workflows, lack of automation or poor communication among claims handlers, medical providers and legal counsel, the result is often the same: “claims creep.” When costs escalate due to prolonged medical treatments, mounting legal fees and higher settlements, this creates a strain for dissatisfied claimants, who are more likely to escalate disputes or pursue litigation when their claims continue to be unresolved.
What helps?
Proactive claims management is essential. Early intervention, automated workflow tools and regular claims reviews have helped expedite decision-making and bring faster resolutions, reducing costs and improving claimant satisfaction.
-
Inadequate Reserving Practices
Accurate reserving is both an art and a science. Under-reserving could lead to unexpected financial exposures destabilizing even the strongest plans. On the other hand, over-reserving ties up capital, impacting profitability and financial flexibility. Both scenarios can cause headaches for any risk manager.
What helps?
Leveraging data-driven approaches and predictive analytics has been transformative. Risk managers maintain a stable and accurate reserving practice by analyzing historical patterns and continuously adjusting reserves as new information comes to light. Regular reserve audits also provide peace of mind and ensure consistency.
-
Ineffective Management of Litigated Claims
Litigation is often where casualty claims become most challenging. Risk managers feel the sting of extended litigation timelines and ballooning legal fees when claims aren’t managed effectively. Early legal intervention and proactive negotiation strategies are essential, yet inadequate training for claims staff can leave these tools underutilized.
What helps?
Developing a litigation management strategy has made all the difference. Early identification of claims with high litigation potential, prompt engagement of legal counsel and proactive settlement tactics have helped control costs and reduce the duration of legal proceedings.
Addressing these pitfalls isn’t easy, but it’s worth it. By incorporating technology, data analytics and proactive claims management practices into workflows, there are significant improvements in the efficiency and effectiveness of managing casualty claims. The potential payoff? Lower costs, better outcomes and a smoother process for everyone involved.
